Date: 2004/04/08 00:10
From: John Kaminski <skylax@comcast.net>
To: Scott Loughrey <scottl44@yahoo.com>
Interesting comment.
jk
Scott Loughrey wrote:
> Another problem with John using Rense to make a call
> for assistance with the 911 survivors is how many
> people do we know actually will respond? If people
> get snuffed and no one seriously responds to John's
> call we make it damn hard for the stunt to be
> repeated.
>
> Rense has what, a million visitors a day? How many
> visitors are just anti-Semitic Nazis?
>
> SL
>
> --- The Webfairy <webfairy@thewebfairy.com> wrote:
> > If anyone associated with BETCHEL,
> > BURSON-MARSTELLER, Gov. Weld, or
> > Goldman Sachs gets in trouble, I shrug.
> > It''t them or us.
> > I still rue that I let you bury that lovely piece of
> > evidence of the
> > helicopter pilot that didn't see no plane, even tho
> > he was flying the
> > same path toward it, if it existed.
> >
> > Covering up to protect somebody is covering up,
> > whatever the motivation.
> >
> > This is important information to uncover this
> > gruesome scam.
> >
> > WE are dealing with well placed, well played
> > "American Heroes" , and if
> > we don't have a LOT of backup, naming whatever names
> > we can name, they
> > will just make us look like traitorous shits.
> >
> > Kaminski can get the issue recognition.
> > No Heroes is even tougher for the tellytubbies to
> > take than No Planes, I
> > think.
> >
> > But the fictional aspects of the story need to be
> > recognized and exposed
> > in order for people to catch on that what has
> > happened since is often
> > fictional setups played to the balconies.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Scott Loughrey wrote:
> >
> > >I think someone would end up dead if you did that.
> > >Shrubbed by the Empire.
> > >
> > >I like the idea of adding recruits, though.
> > >
> > >Scott
> > >
> > >
> > >--- John Kaminski <skylax@comcast.net> wrote:
> > >
> > >>Hello All,
> > >> I just had a brainstorm, maybe. If we could
> > put
> > >>together an e-mail
> > >>consisting the appropriate links of the database
> > on
> > >>the 9/11 victims and
> > >>then the links about proper ways to verify their
> > >>existences, and then
> > >>put them in an e-mail call for volunteers, we
> > could
> > >>do a seriously
> > >>efficient epidemiological study on this. If you
> > >>could construct the
> > >>study parameters and methods, I'd be glad to send
> > it
> > >>out to my list,
> > >>highlight it on Rense etc., and the volunteers who
> > >>respond would be
> > >>assigned a certain letter or letters of the
> > alphabet
> > >>to check out. My
> > >>list is 1,800 and I sent to about 60 newsgroups,
> > who
> > >>then presumably
> > >>would also publish it, so I think we could find at
> > >>least 26 volunteers.
> > >>I wouldn't want to be the one to make the
> > >>assignments or coordinate the
> > >>results, but I sure as heck would publicize the
> > >>results. It could be a
> > >>momentous news story.
> > >>
> > >>jk
> > >>
> > >>No Anthrax Vaccine wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> The story about Mark Bingham, calling his "mom,"
> > >>>
> > >>and saying, "Hi,
> > >>
> > >>>mom, this is Mark Bingham," of course, sounded a
> > >>>
> > >>little fruity. It
> > >>
> > >>>seems like the names can't be found anywhere in
> > >>>
> > >>the Social Security
> > >>
> > >>>Death Index for these fruity stories. However,
> > >>>
> > >>some of the names do
> > >>
> > >>>check out. Which leads me to believe there may
> > >>>
> > >>have been fake names
> > >>
> > >>>listed along with real ones, while the fake
> > family
> > >>>
> > >>members may not
> > >>
> > >>>have a problem with what they are doing because
> > >>>
> > >>they are under
> > >>
> > >>>impression there are no real victims. I suspect
> > >>>
> > >>the whole operation
> > >>
> > >>>was much more of a theatrical stunt than we will
> > >>>
> > >>ever know. But, I
> > >>
> > >>>found something INCREDIBLY BIZARRE! Remember the
> > >>>
> > >>name Todd Beamer,
> > >>
> > >>>and his big "phone call?" I am wondering if it
> > is
> > >>>
> > >>the same Todd
> > >>
> > >>>Beamer who was born on...., well, just look at
> > the
> > >>>
> > >>record I found
> > >>
> > >>>below:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >> Name Birth Death Last Last SSN
> >
> > >> Issued Tools
> > Order
> > >> Residence Benefit
> >
> > >>
> > >>Record?
> > >> 10
> > >> TODD E 11 Jun (none
> >
> > >> SS-5 Letter
> > >> BEAMER Sep 1997 (72) specified)
> > >>544-92-3952 Oregon Add Post-em [Click here to
> > order
> > >>a copy of the original record]
> > >> 1968
> >
> > >> Search Ancestry.com
> > >> (P)
> > >>
> > >>> Isn't that cute? The only Todd Beamer that came
> > >>>
> > >>up in the SSDI, and
> > >>
> > >>>he just happened to be born on....September 11,
> > >>>
> > >>1968. Talk about a
> > >>
> > >>>"coincidence."
> > >>>
> > >
> > >
> > >__________________________________
> > >Do you Yahoo!?
> > >Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway
> > >http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > -------------------------------------
> > Any time you're ready to catch on....
> > http://cloakanddagger.ca
> >
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway
> http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/