Date: 2004/04/08 01:27
From: John Kaminski <skylax@comcast.net>
To: Scott Loughrey <scottl44@yahoo.com>
We need people who can devote all their time to running through the
names. I can't.
jk
Scott Loughrey wrote:
> Before I'm called a "self sacrificial sucker ready to
> pull punches" again here's another point. We can
> always ask our most trusted researchers for help
> quietly. People that have no controversial whatsoever
> with their views. Plague Pup, for ex.
>
> So, the question for me is how big of a team of
> researchers do we need?
>
> SL
>
> --- The Webfairy <webfairy@thewebfairy.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >I need to think what you're saying over. This is
> > no
> > >ordinary decision; people's lives are at stake.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yeah. Ours.
> > I'm no self sacrificial sucker ready to pull punches
> > so some unknown
> > stranger involved too deep won't get in trouble.
> >
> > If the Coup wants to keep busy killing off low level
> > perps, it beats
> > starting roundups of researchers.
> >
> > My concern is that the issue could bring scorn down
> > on Kaminski.
> > It has to be so well supported people just shut up
> > and ignore it with
> > their fingers in their ears if they're not ready to
> > understand. It's
> > all circumstantial evidence. Most people can't add 2
> > and 2.
> >
> > Chances are dim we can dig "Todd Beamer" out of
> > whatever bunker he sits
> > playing checkers with Cheney in.
> >
> > The whole issue dovetails with what Naserian found
> > that Flight 93's
> > plane is still in regular service, but some other
> > mysterious plane did
> > crash that day.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Scott Loughrey wrote:
> >
> > >>"Covering up to protect somebody is covering up,
> > >>whatever the motivation."
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >I need to think what you're saying over. This is
> > no
> > >ordinary decision; people's lives are at stake.
> > >
> > >SL
> > >
> > >
> > >--- The Webfairy <webfairy@thewebfairy.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >>If anyone associated with BETCHEL,
> > >>BURSON-MARSTELLER, Gov. Weld, or
> > >>Goldman Sachs gets in trouble, I shrug.
> > >>It''t them or us.
> > >>I still rue that I let you bury that lovely piece
> > of
> > >>evidence of the
> > >>helicopter pilot that didn't see no plane, even
> > tho
> > >>he was flying the
> > >>same path toward it, if it existed.
> > >>
> > >>Covering up to protect somebody is covering up,
> > >>whatever the motivation.
> > >>
> > >>This is important information to uncover this
> > >>gruesome scam.
> > >>
> > >>WE are dealing with well placed, well played
> > >>"American Heroes" , and if
> > >>we don't have a LOT of backup, naming whatever
> > names
> > >>we can name, they
> > >>will just make us look like traitorous shits.
> > >>
> > >>Kaminski can get the issue recognition.
> > >>No Heroes is even tougher for the tellytubbies to
> > >>take than No Planes, I
> > >>think.
> > >>
> > >>But the fictional aspects of the story need to be
> > >>recognized and exposed
> > >>in order for people to catch on that what has
> > >>happened since is often
> > >>fictional setups played to the balconies.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>Scott Loughrey wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>I think someone would end up dead if you did
> > that.
> > >>>Shrubbed by the Empire.
> > >>>
> > >>>I like the idea of adding recruits, though.
> > >>>
> > >>>Scott
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>--- John Kaminski <skylax@comcast.net> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>>Hello All,
> > >>>> I just had a brainstorm, maybe. If we could
> > >>>>
> > >>put
> > >>
> > >>>>together an e-mail
> > >>>>consisting the appropriate links of the database
> > >>>>
> > >>on
> > >>
> > >>>>the 9/11 victims and
> > >>>>then the links about proper ways to verify their
> > >>>>existences, and then
> > >>>>put them in an e-mail call for volunteers, we
> > >>>>
> > >>could
> > >>
> > >>>>do a seriously
> > >>>>efficient epidemiological study on this. If you
> > >>>>could construct the
> > >>>>study parameters and methods, I'd be glad to
> > send
> > >>>>
> > >>it
> > >>
> > >>>>out to my list,
> > >>>>highlight it on Rense etc., and the volunteers
> > who
> > >>>>respond would be
> > >>>>assigned a certain letter or letters of the
> > >>>>
> > >>alphabet
> > >>
> > >>>>to check out. My
> > >>>>list is 1,800 and I sent to about 60 newsgroups,
> > >>>>
> > >>who
> > >>
> > >>>>then presumably
> > >>>>would also publish it, so I think we could find
> > at
> > >>>>least 26 volunteers.
> > >>>>I wouldn't want to be the one to make the
> > >>>>assignments or coordinate the
> > >>>>results, but I sure as heck would publicize the
> > >>>>results. It could be a
> > >>>>momentous news story.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>jk
> > >>>>
> > >>>>No Anthrax Vaccine wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>The story about Mark Bingham, calling his
> > "mom,"
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>and saying, "Hi,
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>mom, this is Mark Bingham," of course, sounded
> > a
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>little fruity. It
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>seems like the names can't be found anywhere in
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>the Social Security
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>Death Index for these fruity stories. However,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>some of the names do
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>check out. Which leads me to believe there may
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>have been fake names
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>listed along with real ones, while the fake
> > >>>>>
> > >>family
> >
> === message truncated ===
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway
> http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/