Date: 2004/04/08 00:10
From: Scott Loughrey <scottl44@yahoo.com>
To: The Webfairy <webfairy@thewebfairy.com>
WF, I'm laughing very hard at your writing while you
make your case.
What kind of piece do you want to write John? What
tone are you going to use? Are you going to sub in
the word "Jew" or "Jewish" every time you mean
Zionist? Or will it be something that could be passed
around to many listservs?
WF, tell me more about the nature of the presentation
before writing any more about your feelings.
(However, I'm still chuckling.)
SL
--- The Webfairy <webfairy@thewebfairy.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >I need to think what you're saying over. This is
> no
> >ordinary decision; people's lives are at stake.
> >
>
>
>
> Yeah. Ours.
> I'm no self sacrificial sucker ready to pull punches
> so some unknown
> stranger involved too deep won't get in trouble.
>
> If the Coup wants to keep busy killing off low level
> perps, it beats
> starting roundups of researchers.
>
> My concern is that the issue could bring scorn down
> on Kaminski.
> It has to be so well supported people just shut up
> and ignore it with
> their fingers in their ears if they're not ready to
> understand. It's
> all circumstantial evidence. Most people can't add 2
> and 2.
>
> Chances are dim we can dig "Todd Beamer" out of
> whatever bunker he sits
> playing checkers with Cheney in.
>
> The whole issue dovetails with what Naserian found
> that Flight 93's
> plane is still in regular service, but some other
> mysterious plane did
> crash that day.
>
>
>
>
> Scott Loughrey wrote:
>
> >>"Covering up to protect somebody is covering up,
> >>whatever the motivation."
> >>
> >
> >
> >I need to think what you're saying over. This is
> no
> >ordinary decision; people's lives are at stake.
> >
> >SL
> >
> >
> >--- The Webfairy <webfairy@thewebfairy.com> wrote:
> >
> >>If anyone associated with BETCHEL,
> >>BURSON-MARSTELLER, Gov. Weld, or
> >>Goldman Sachs gets in trouble, I shrug.
> >>It''t them or us.
> >>I still rue that I let you bury that lovely piece
> of
> >>evidence of the
> >>helicopter pilot that didn't see no plane, even
> tho
> >>he was flying the
> >>same path toward it, if it existed.
> >>
> >>Covering up to protect somebody is covering up,
> >>whatever the motivation.
> >>
> >>This is important information to uncover this
> >>gruesome scam.
> >>
> >>WE are dealing with well placed, well played
> >>"American Heroes" , and if
> >>we don't have a LOT of backup, naming whatever
> names
> >>we can name, they
> >>will just make us look like traitorous shits.
> >>
> >>Kaminski can get the issue recognition.
> >>No Heroes is even tougher for the tellytubbies to
> >>take than No Planes, I
> >>think.
> >>
> >>But the fictional aspects of the story need to be
> >>recognized and exposed
> >>in order for people to catch on that what has
> >>happened since is often
> >>fictional setups played to the balconies.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Scott Loughrey wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>I think someone would end up dead if you did
> that.
> >>>Shrubbed by the Empire.
> >>>
> >>>I like the idea of adding recruits, though.
> >>>
> >>>Scott
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>--- John Kaminski <skylax@comcast.net> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Hello All,
> >>>> I just had a brainstorm, maybe. If we could
> >>>>
> >>put
> >>
> >>>>together an e-mail
> >>>>consisting the appropriate links of the database
> >>>>
> >>on
> >>
> >>>>the 9/11 victims and
> >>>>then the links about proper ways to verify their
> >>>>existences, and then
> >>>>put them in an e-mail call for volunteers, we
> >>>>
> >>could
> >>
> >>>>do a seriously
> >>>>efficient epidemiological study on this. If you
> >>>>could construct the
> >>>>study parameters and methods, I'd be glad to
> send
> >>>>
> >>it
> >>
> >>>>out to my list,
> >>>>highlight it on Rense etc., and the volunteers
> who
> >>>>respond would be
> >>>>assigned a certain letter or letters of the
> >>>>
> >>alphabet
> >>
> >>>>to check out. My
> >>>>list is 1,800 and I sent to about 60 newsgroups,
> >>>>
> >>who
> >>
> >>>>then presumably
> >>>>would also publish it, so I think we could find
> at
> >>>>least 26 volunteers.
> >>>>I wouldn't want to be the one to make the
> >>>>assignments or coordinate the
> >>>>results, but I sure as heck would publicize the
> >>>>results. It could be a
> >>>>momentous news story.
> >>>>
> >>>>jk
> >>>>
> >>>>No Anthrax Vaccine wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>The story about Mark Bingham, calling his
> "mom,"
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>and saying, "Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>mom, this is Mark Bingham," of course, sounded
> a
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>little fruity. It
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>seems like the names can't be found anywhere in
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>the Social Security
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>Death Index for these fruity stories. However,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>some of the names do
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>check out. Which leads me to believe there may
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>have been fake names
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>listed along with real ones, while the fake
> >>>>>
> >>family
>
=== message truncated ===
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway
http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/