FCS- Future Combat System (from 9/11 to the Future) -Updates
-What
the "AntiWar"- and "9/11 Truth Movement" doesn't wanna tell you,
including
the latest false opposition group of Vancouver
by ewing2001
July 1,
2007


As explained in earlier research
columns at 911res, i consider FCS
as the main privatized system hub of StarWars aka MDA
aka Trailblazer (aka Haarp aka SDI aka ? etc..),
which combined the
logistical use of exoW (incl. dirEN) on the morning of 9/11,
in combination
with the conceptional 9/11 TV-, Video- and Media Fakery layers.
[see also http://www.army.mil/fcs/bios.html ]
Here are some 'historical' articles about FCS between 'then and
now',
which shows the significance of the 9/11 [media] Cover-Up for an
endless war:

Future Combat Systems - Topics 2007
http://www.defense-update.com/topics/topics-fcs.htm
Four Unmanned Systems Removed from FCS, Saving US$3.4 Billion
http://www.defense-update.com/newscast/0207/news/110207_fcs-u.htm
"...the U.S. Army is restructuring and stretching the "Future Combat Systems" (FCS) program, eliminating $3.4 billion from its budget over the next five fiscal years....
...stretching the fielding of the 15 brigades over five years, starting 2015 and eliminating or deferring four systems from the 18 planned, including the Class II and Class III UAVs, the Armed Robotic Vehicle (ARV) and Intelligent Munitions System (IMS). Total cost of the restructured program is expected to be $162 billion with another $2 billion slated for additional construction required. The FCS was designed as a “family” of 18 individual systems, plus the network and the soldier -- referred to as 18+1+1. With four of the systems deferred, the system is now 14+1+1...

.jpg)
...remaining systems, such as Honeywell's Class I mini-UAV and Northrop
Grumman's Class IV FireScout...
...Companies affected by the decision
could be Textron Systems, a Textron Inc. company (NYSE:TXT), the prime
contractof for the IMS program, and BAE Systems, which was involved with
the ARV. However, both companies are heavily engaged with other elements of the
FCS program. For example, Textron Systems is also pursueing the FCS-UGS system
which should receive more focused resulting from the elimination of IMS....
June 9 2007
Heavenly visions [GCP]
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/7eec9842-1625-11dc-a7ce-000b5df10621,_i_rssPage=df217c24-3011-11da-ba9f-00000e2511c8.html
By
Akiko Busch
"...The beautiful thing about any new technology is the way it can be put to
unexpected uses...
...And so it is with satellite maps. Since the first
weather satellite, Tiros 1, delivered pictures of clouds from outer space in
1960, these maps have been used for everything from scientific research to
military surveillance, communications to navigation...
...Geospatial
content providers, as they are now called, offer us seemingly limitless
archives of information. ..

22-May-2007
“Fighting Folly” - a new 'division' within DEW/FCS
Supporters?
http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/americas_usa/index.php?offset=1490
Future
Combat Systems in the Crosshairs
"....May may be murder for the US Army’s $160+ billion Future Combat
Systems program...
...bipartisan recommendations from the House Armed
Services Committee propose a nearly $900 million budget cut in FY 2008, and have
the US Army arguing that the future of the program is in danger...
http://www.governmentexecutive.com/story_page.cfm?filepath=/features/0507-01/0507-01s3.htm
Fighting
Folly
By Greg Grant ggrant@govexec.com Government Executive May
1, 2007
"...Future Combat Systems, an ultramodern suite of armored vehicles, robots and aerial drones connected via a sophisticated battle command network. The program, for which cost estimates range from $164 billion to more than $230 billion, aims to transform the Army into a lighter, more agile force...
...Years before the Army embarked on FCS, independent analysis funded by the Army showed that those concepts were deeply flawed. What's more, the Army's own experience of combat in Iraq and Afghanistan further debunks concepts central to FCS.
.jpg)
The Army has so far spent $8 billion and is a third of the way through the development part of FCS, with full production scheduled for 2013. How is it progressing? That depends on whom you ask. According to the Army and Boeing, the program is "on cost and on schedule," as Dennis Muilenburg, Boeing's general manager for FCS, said in a conference with reporters last summer. But an assessment of cost growth and the findings of a yearlong Government Accountability Office audit suggest FCS is a costly mess.
The Army's original price tag back in 2003 was $92 billion. Since then, the Army has restructured the program twice and now estimates development and production will cost $163.7 billion, a 76 percent increase...
...Software needed to control FCS has doubled from initial estimates to a staggering 63 million lines of code, three times the amount being written for the Joint Strike Fighter..."
[ed: The 'lines of code' screwed up once already.
The day of 9/11
presented us a flawed cartoon by WABC7 and FOX11 ;
WarCriminals like 911truth.org and the DRG/PJones clan instead look into the other direction and misled 100.000s followers if not millions worlwide, sacrifying the U.S. into a WW scenario and bancruptcy against Russia and China.]
Mar. 9, 2007
http://www.defense-update.com/newscast/0307/news/090307_ics.htm
The
first Integrated Computer Systems (ICS) were delivered last week to the U.S.
Army’s Future Combat Systems (FCS) program...
...The ICS team include
General Dynamics C4 and Rockwell Collins.
The ICS was developed in just
21 months to support the rapid spin-out of FCS capability into existing
vehicles...
Feb 12, 2007
http://www.defense-update.com/newscast/0207/news/110207_fcs-test.htm
Earlier
this month (February 2007) the U.S. Army reached an important milestone in the
Future Combat Systems' program, completing the first live-fire exercise,
Experiment 1.1

15-May-2006
JIN Stays in the Lamp
http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/jin-stays-in-the-lamp-02256/#more-2256
09-May-2006
DRS
& Ionatron to Cooperate on Energy Weapons
http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/2006/05/drs-ionatron-to-cooperate-on-energy-weapons/index.php
December 15, 2005
FCS Contractors Step Up Advocacy Campaign
http://www.military.com/features/0,15240,82917,00.html
"...Defense contractors in charge of developing the Army's Future Combat
System want subcontractors...
Boeing and SAIC want to educate the entire
team about the political and budgetary issues that surround FCS' development
...

June 2005
FCS Program Rolls Forward in Formation
http://www.cotsjournalonline.com/home/article.php?id=100346&pg=3
http://www.cotsjournalonline.com/home/article.php?id=100346&pg=4
A
wireless data network, with advanced communications and technologies, links
soldiers with 18 new, lightweight manned and unmanned ground vehicles, unmanned
aircraft, sensors and weapons—and it’s all in one program...

Figure 4
Shown here is the schedule for “Spinning Out” technologies. Starting in 2006 there’s a decision point to decide which things will be spun out in Spin Out 1. Likely candidates are the unattended ground sensors and the Intelligent Munitions Systems.
...Several homogenous communication systems make up the FCS communication network. These include Joint Tactical Radio System (JTRS) Clusters 1 and 5 with Wideband Network Waveform (WNW) and Soldier Radio Waveform (SRW), Network Data Link and Warfighter Information Network–Tactical (WIN-T)...
...In 2008 (in the outer band) the Army is going to stand up an experimental brigade combat team...
...Going around the spiral chart, prototypes of all the families of vehicles will be tested and come out around Spin Out 3 and Spin Out 4. On the inner rings there are limited user tests for the main program and then production decisions and initial operational capability scheduled for 2014/2015...
...Unlike traditional programs, FCS is managed by a Lead Systems Integrator (LSI) team. Comprised of Boeing and Science Applications International Corp. (SAIC), the team integrates other companies’ products and helps the Army manage the program....
May 13, 2005
Bob Bowman's 'former company': General Dynamics and
ANS
General Dynamics Awarded US$51 Million Contract
http://www.utdallas.edu/research/friday_fyi/050513/corp_news.html
Volume
5, Issue 13
General Dynamics Robotic Systems has been awarded a US$50.7 million modification to its $186 million U.S. Army Future Combat Systems Autonomous Navigation System base contract from Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC). SAIC and Boeing (NYSE: BA) constitute the FCS Lead Systems Integrator team. Total value of the contract is now approx. $237 million...
...The initial contract for development of the Autonomous Navigation System (ANS) for ground vehicles was awarded in December 2003. With this modification, the period of performance for the ANS program has been extended from September 2009 to March 2013...
.jpg)
http://www.rmbowman.com/ssn/bio2001.htm
"...Until
July, 1982, he was a Vice President of Space Communications Company. Before
that, Dr. Bowman was Manager, Advanced Space Programs at General Dynamics,
responsible for the communications spacecraft product line. Culminating a
22-year Air Force career in 1978, Col. Bowman was Director of Advanced Space
Programs Development for the Air Force Space Division...."
Feb. 17, 2005
Army to pick FCS system in 2006
http://www.fcw.com/article88040-02-16-05-Web
"...Officials
in the Army and the industry team of Boeing and Science Applications
International Corp. began studying the issue about a year ago. They will
complete the trade analysis in the middle of 2006, said Dennis Muilenberg, vice
president and general manager and FCS program manager in Boeing's Integrated
Defense Systems business unit. The Boeing/SAIC team helps manage the
multibillion-dollar program as lead systems integrator...."
May 2004
Army Future Combat Systems Face High Risk of Failure,
Cautions Study
http://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/issues/2004/May/Army_Future.htm
"...The
Army began system development and demonstration in May 2003 and plans to make an
FCS production decision in 2008..."
April 5, 2004
FCS Watch
REPORT: ARMY "FUTURE COMBAT" IN PERIL,
GENERALS KNEW ALL ALONG
http://www.defensetech.org/archives/000851.html
http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2004/04/62931
"...It's
been called the most ambitious military effort since the Manhattan
Project, and the centerpiece of Donald Rumsfeld's plans to overhaul
America's armed forces:
...a new congressional report is alleging that the
"Future Combat Systems" program is poised for major delays and a financial train
wreck. Worst of all, the report claims, the Army knew this was going to happen
all along....

6 Nov 2003
Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited
TACOM
http://www.army.mil/howwewillfight/references/14%20040428_2004flipbook.pdf
Program
Managers for Future Combat Systems:
BG Don Schenk, PM Future Combat
Systems
COL Bill Johnson, PM FCS Technologies
Dennis A. Muilenburg, PM LSI
Office
Mar 01, '03
U.S. Army's Future Combat System Will Run Linux
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/03/02/0216215&mode=thread&tid=103&tid=163
"...In
2001 Boeing was chosen to be the lead system integrator for the Army's Future
Combat System.
...while Boeing's official FCS site doesn't have a lot of
technical details, but you can find some good information at Global
Security...
... a little known fact is that the OS for FCS will be Linux (FAQ
4 here.)"
http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/ic/fcs/bia/faq_c4isr_conf.html
Conference 11/13/02
Future Combat Systems - Frequently Asked
Questions
http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/ic/fcs/bia/faq_c4isr_conf.html
"...Do
you plan to have any special considerations for foreign companies to participate
in FCS?
...To date we have several international vendors participating on
the FCS program...
March 07, 2002
SEAL BEACH, Calif.,
Boeing-SAIC Team Selected
for U.S. Army's Future Combat Systems Program
http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2002/q1/nr_020307s.html
Today's
announcement selecting The Boeing Company [NYSE:BA] - Science Applications
International Corporation (SAIC) team as the Lead System Integrator (LSI) for
the U.S. Army's Future Combat Systems (FCS) places it in a unique partnership
role with government on a program that is key to the Army's transformation
goals...
..."FCS represents a new, accelerated approach to acquiring
systems-of-systems capabilities," said Jim Albaugh, president and CEO of Boeing
Space and Communications...
December 18, 2001
ARMY ANNOUNCES HEADQUARTERS TRANSFORMATION
PLAN
http://www.defenselink.mil/releases/release.aspx?releaseid=3192

September 25, 2001
Robotic Follower
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ground/follower.htm
The
Robotic Follower Advanced Technology Demonstration (ATD) is focused on the
maturation & demonstration of robotics technology required for early
insertion into Future Combat Systems (FCS)...
...The lead system maneuvers
over a tactically significant route and passes electronic breadcrumbs, e.g.,
Global Positioning Satellite (GPS) positions, to the following
systems...
...On September 25, 2001 General Dynamics Land Systems, Sterling
Heights, Mich., was awarded a $500,000 increment as part of a $23,051,717
cost-plus-fixed-fee contract for four years of research and development of a
Vetronics Technology Integration effort....
...This remarkable feat, six
months in the making, successfully illustrated that it is possible to field
unmanned vehicles that are capable of performing multiple tasks for the Future
Combat System....
9/11





?
18-20 June 2001
Future Combat Systems
Authors: Josef Schroeder;
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY WASHINGTON DC
Abstract: Presentation given at the
Armaments for the Army Transformation Conference, 18-20 June 2001, sponsored by
the National Defense Industrial Association...

30 APR 2001
Army Transformation Conference held 20 June
2001
http://handle.dtic.mil/100.2/ADA399769
http://stinet.dtic.mil/oai/oai?&verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA399769
Framework
for the Analysis of the Future Combat System
[ed: the real 'pnac
quote']
"...The United States Army is frenetically engaged in an ambitious initiative to transform itself from a Cold War legacy force into a new millennium force, the Objective Force, designed to dominate potential enemies through the first half of the new century. The centerpiece of this transformed Army will be the Future Combat System (FCS)...
[ed: see also 13)-20) Terror Drills during June 2001
incl. "UA 1230 terror
drill", Westmore County Drill area around Shanksville,
Amalgam Virgo 01,
"Operation Amber Sky" Dayton Airport, Dark Winter/June 22-23 and others
http://www.team8plus.org/forum_viewtopic.php?6.16
]
On May 9, 2000 DARPA and the Army selected four contractor teams for the
first phase of the Future Combat Systems (FCS) program.
Future Combat
Systems - Phase 1
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ground/fcs-1.htm
The selected contractor team leads and agreement amounts were:
* The Boeing Co., Phantom Works, Seattle, Wash. - Agreement amount
(cost-shared with company): $23,299,998. Government share: $10,000,000.
*
Science Applications International Corp., McLean, Va. - Agreement amount
(cost-shared with company): $12,830,470. Government share: $10,000,000.
*
TEAM FoCuS Vision CONSORTIUM, led by General Dynamics Land Systems Inc.,
Sterling Heights, Mich., and Raytheon Company, Plano, Texas - Agreement amount
(cost-shared with consortium): $14,000,000. Government share: $10,000,000.
*
Team Gladiator (TRW Inc., Carson, Calif.; Lockheed Martin Inc., Lockheed Martin
Vought Systems, Dallas, Texas; CSC/Nichols Research, Huntsville, Ala.; Carnegie
Mellon Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Penn.; Battelle Memorial Institute,
Columbus, Ohio; IITRI/AB Tech Group, Alexandria, Va.) - Agreement amount
(cost-shared with consortium): $15,461,499. Government share: $10,000,000.
The system of systems capability is to be demonstrated by FY 2006 through a series of demonstrations in conjunction with modeling and simulation...
March 28, 2000
Future Combat Systems
11th Annual US
Army
Ground Vehicle Survivability Symposium
http://www.dtic.mil/ndia/11ground/vanfosson.pdf
Marion
H. Van Fosson, LTC, USA
PM Future Combat Systems
mvanfosson@darpa.mil
Agreements Officer Ms. Swatloski
rswatloski@darpa.mil
TRADOC
COL
Page
paget@monroe.army.mil
DPM
Mr.
Marrero
marrerop@tacom.army.mil
DCSOPS
MAJ
Brown
Tyrone.Brown@HQDA.Army.Mil
...
FCS Survivability
Don’t be Detected
Challenges
Electromagnetic and thermal signature management
Typical Enabling Technologies
– Signal jamming
– Decoys and
deception
The early FCS contractors
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ground/fcs-back.htm
United
Defense Limited Partnership, San Jose, CA; Sanders, a Lockheed Martin
Company, Nashua, NH; TRW, Redondo Beach, CA; Hughes Danbury,
Danbury, CN; General Dynamics Land Systems, Warren, MI; Chang
Industries, Salt Lake City, UT & Laverne, CA; New Mexico Tech,
Socorro , NM; IST, Goleta, CA, Aerojet, Azusa, CA.
1999
https://acc.dau.mil/CommunityBrowser.aspx?id=30348&lang=en-US
"...The
FCS, which represents the most advanced component of the Objective Force, was
first created as a program in 1999 and is expected to field its first system to
troops in 2012..."

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0SVI/is_4_12/ai_n16128490
"...On
October 12, 1999, the Chief of Staff of the Army, General Eric Shinseki,
delivered the keynote address at the Association of the United States Army
(AUSA) annual symposium in Washington, D.C. In this momentous speech, he shared
his vision for transforming the Army...
...the objective force
(Shinseki, 1999)...
...A short time later, the Chief of Staff gave the
Army its mission: build and field the first Unit of Action, equipped with Future
Combat Systems (FCS), capable of full spectrum operations, by the end of
2010....
[ed: Eric Shinseki served as the 34th Chief of Staff of the United
States Army (1999 - 2003)]
January-February 1998
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/docs/1fcs98.pdf
The
Future Combat System (FCS): PART THREE: POWERING THE NEW SYSTEM by Asher H.
Sharoni and Lawrence D. Bacon ARMOR
July-August 1997
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/docs/4fcs97.pdf
The
Future Combat System (FCS) - A Technology Evolution Review and Feasibility
Assessment
by Asher H. Sharoni and Lawrence D. Bacon ARMOR —
1997
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/news/1997/4fcs97.pdf
"...the
conclusion that the 2020-2030 future battlefield environment’s operational
requirements could only be met — on equal terms — by the FCS...."
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)

.jpg)

.jpg)










.jpg)









.gif)


.gif)








.jpg)







.jpg)

.gif)

















you neglect to mention: THE
you neglect to mention:
THE *USSR* HAD SPACE WEAPONS!!
http://u2r2h-documents.blogspot.com/2007/01/estonia-particle-weapon-poofed-wtc.html
Very difficult to find anything on it.. but you should try.
My working hypothesis is that a russian satellite was hijacked.
--
http://u2r2h.blogspot.com/
http://u2r2h-documents.blogspot.com