Slow motion closeups from the day that changed our lives

Blob(s)11
Pavel
Slideshows
Edna Cintron
When Pigs Fly
Bluebeam
CameraPanet
Khashoggi
Bldg 7
93
First Hit Closeup
NO PLANE
Ghostplane
Glow
Missileout
911 Foreknowledge
Insane
Second Hit Gallery
Pull It
Bombs
Birds
Pentagon
Demolition
CrimeScene
Real Plane Debris
Flight 587
big fake
UAV
nick nack
FCS
WING cartoon

Mindblower
Hague Hoax
Flapjack
Flashies
Exotic Weapons
Hutchison Effects
Hague Hoax
Flashvid Theatre
Halloween
Deflection
DemolitionX
Curtainchewer
Gumbel
Jumpers
Real

Peggy's Pix
Video Archive

 

NO Plane!

Webfairy 911 Memorial

Several versions to compare:
WGN CNN-taner DVD CNN2 ABC
Marcus Finds A Plane (cos he put it there himself!!)


What really happened to American Airlines Flights 11 and 77 on Sept 11, 2001

by Gerard Homgren 8:44am Thu Nov 13 '03 (Modified on 9:33am Thu Nov 13 '03)

aa1177_3@hotmail.com

http://sydney.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=36354&group=webcast

The flights alleged to have hit the Nth WTC tower and the Pentagon did not exist.
They were not scheduled to fly that day
.

On the basis of photographic and physical evidence, it has now been established for some time that on Sept 11, 2001 the damage to the Pentagon was caused by something other than the hijacked Boeing 757, American Airlines Flight 77 claimed by the government to have crashed into the building. Hunt the Boeing http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/pentagone/erreurs_en.htm Physical and Mathematical analysis of Pentagon crash. Oct 2002 http://thewebfairy.com/911/holmgren/ Did AA 77 hit the Pentagon? Eyewitness accounts examined. June 2002 http://hamilton.indymedia.org:8081/front.php3?article_id=1786&group=webcast

The amazing Pentalawn.
http://www.cryptogon.com/docs/Introducing%20the%20amazing%20Penta-Lawn%202000!%20(9-11).htm

More recently, its become widely accepted on the basis of video evidence that the object which hit the North Tower of the WTC at 8.46 that morning was not the hijacked Boeing 767, American Airlines Flight 11, as claimed in the official story.

http://thewebfairy.com/911/noplane/index.htm http://home.earthlink.net/~whatzit http://thewebfairy.com/whatzit/index2.html In response to these observations, both supporters of the truth and blind deniers of it agree on one thing. It raises the question - "If these flights did not hit the buildings as alleged, then where did they go?'

We are now in a position to answer that question.

First lets recap on the official story of what happened to four planes that morning.

AA 11 left Boston for LA at about 8 am, was reported as hijacked about 8.25, and hit the Nth Tower at about 8.46. UA 175 left Boston for LA at about the same time, was reported hijacked at about 8.55 and hit the Sth Tower at about 9.03 AA 77 left Dulles for LA about the same time , was reported hijacked at about 8.55 and hit the Pentagon at about 9.45 UA 93 left Newark for SF at about the same time, was reported hijacked about 9.45 and crashed in PA at about 10.10.

The Bureau of transportation website contains search pages, where one can pull up detailed statistics about the history of which flights have been scheduled for which airports on any given day. Go to
http://www.bts.gov/ntda/oai/index.shtml
and click on "detailed statistics" where one can search records of scheduled and actual departure times, arrival times, diversions and cancellations by departure airport, arrival airport, airline and flight number. Searches for Sept 11 2001 reveal that the flights AA 11 and AA 77 did not exist. They were not scheduled that day. Here are the search results which I encourage everyone to check for themselves.

A search for UA flights from Newark on Sept 11, 2001 shows 0093 to SF was scheduled at 8.00 and actually departed at 8.01. It is listed as "diverted" and did not arrive at its destination.

A search for UA from Boston on that day shows 0175 to LA was scheduled for 8.00 and actually departed at 7.58. Also listed as "diverted" and did not arrive at its destination.

The term "diverted" does not specify any differentiation between legally diverted, hijacked or crashed, so the data gives no indication one way or the other as to truth of the official story about what happened to them, but it does confirm that they departed as per the official story and did not arrive at their destinations.

A search for AA flights from Boston that day does not list 0011. The earliest scheduled AA flight to LA that day was 0181 at 11.00

A search for AA flights from Dulles that day does not list 0077. The earliest scheduled AA flight to LA was 0135 at 11.15.

Here's a different search method. By returning to the search page URL listed earlier, and clicking on â summary statistics â , one can find the historical reliability and punctuality of specific flights over a period of time, by specifying the airline and flight number and defining the time period. The search then returns figures on average delays in departure and arrival times and percentages of cancelled or diverted flights. If one searches specifically for UA 175 or UA 93 narrowed down to sept 11 only, the search returns the result of "diverted" for each flight. A similar search for either AA 11 or AA 77 on that date returns "no data found".

If you search for AA 11 or AA 77 on different days, you will find that they were regularly scheduled flights right up to Sept 10. AA 11 was scheduled daily from Logan to LA at 8.00, and AA 77 from Dulles to LA at 7.45. On Sept 11, they were not scheduled. Not cancelled. Just not scheduled.

On Sept 12, they re-appear in the schedule (obviously as cancelled for the next few days) up until Sept 20 when both flights change their numbers.

Thus the official figures from the Bureau of Transportation statistics indicate that neither AA 11 nor AA 77 flew on Sept, 11 2001. This solves the question of what happened to them. Nothing. Because the flights did not exist. This is consistent with other evidence which shows that they were not the objects responsible for the Pentagon and Nth WTC tower incidents.

This still leaves unanswered the question of what happened to the passengers alleged to be aboard the non existent flights. In the case of AA 77, while one can always speculate about the most plausible scenarios, I prefer to wait until some real evidence emerges. However in the case of AA 11, I think it is worth noting that UA 175 left from the same airport, at the same time for the same destination as that normally applicable to AA 11.

Therefore, although there is no direct evidence to support the claim, it would seem reasonable to speculate at this stage that any passengers who were regular fliers on AA 11, and asked to booked on it that day, went to the airport, expecting to get on AA 11, as per the normal routine. They were then told that there was a last minute problem with the flight which could not be fixed within a reasonable period of time, and were offered a flight on UA 175 as compensation.

The data in this search indicates that we have been systematically lied to about the alleged flight paths and hijacking sequence of AA 11 and AA 77, as well as the alleged phone calls made from the planes.

It also indicates probable complicity by American Airlines in the events of Sept 11 , 2001.

For the benefit of any NWO operatives reading this, just in case you' re thinking of trying to pressure the Bureau into playing hanky panky with the records, the search results pages have already been backed up and widely distributed. Nevertheless, I do encourage all readers to do the searches themselves and back up the results pages, just in case this happens.

*****************

This material may be freely reproduced without permission providing that it is not for commercial purposes. Please include the author's name, the URL where you found it and the copyright notice.