Lately I've suffered a lot of big-word tellytubby talk trying to convince people that video is meaningless. The latest news is because video decimates Chrominence, this is something dreadful that makes video unreliable, so you shouldn't believe your eyes but listen to them instead because they know a lot of big words.
Digital video decimates chrominence
because it is the aspect of analog video that carries hue information. Once
television's signal has travelled thru the Aether and been projected, the job of
chrominence is done. If it hangs around on a digital image, red and blue
chrominence just create noize. There is even a very expensive program to filter
out chrominence for high resolution digital camera images suffering noize
problems.
http://www.camerabits.com/QM2.html

http://mbb.harvard.edu/evolution_of_mind_and_brain/chapter_12.pdf
"Three tiny electron beams (one for
each color) sweep across the screen incredibly fast to activate the pixels.
That is, an entire picture is never present at any instant; rather, a television
“image” represents a temporal smearing of these moving beams. Each
beam starts in the upper left corner of the screen and moves from left to right.
Then it jumps back and steps downward a tiny bit and sweeps from left to right
again, and again, until it has swept across all 525 rows of elements that make
up the screen-all in one-thirtieth of a second. It’s sort of like taking
a Fourth of July sparkler and moving it incredibly rapidly back and forth and
up and down to get a square image. The three beams scan simultaneously, illuminating
the rows in an alternating regular pattern called interlacing."
If a television image has been digitized at other than it's native size (the information in an American analog television video digitizes as a 352x240 pixel image) then interlacing becomes a problem. In areas of high movement, the second pass falls behind.
This image shows the effect of interlacing in a rapidly panning scene in a double-sized capture.




It is unfortunate that a television's "pixel" - a dot capable of red, green, blue or off, is confused with a digital pixel, a square of information given any of 16 million colors.
More:
http://thewebfairy.com/911/presentation
Deinterlaced Version of the
"Pavel First Hit" Footage
http://thewebfairy.com/911/pavel/newpavelhit.avi
My first attempts at rendering
clear and reasonably sized Pavel footage:
http://thewebfairy.com/911/video/pavel.mpg
http://thewebfairy.com/911/video/pavel-deshaken.xvid.avi
Slideshow of all 1789 frames
http://thewebfairy.com/911/slideshow/pavel/
The Official Pavel Story
http://thewebfairy.com/911/pavel/officialstory.htm
Heavy Traffic
http://thewebfairy.com/911/pavel/traffic.htm
Answering Photo Debunkery
http://thewebfairy.com/911/pavel/presentation.htm
Terrorize.DK Version:
http://terrorize.dk/911/wtc1hit2/
My first look at the Pavel
footage:
http://thewebfairy.com/911/newfirsthit
So-Called Alleged "Pavel"
footage was SHOT FROM A FIRETRUCK
http://thewebfairy.com/911/pavel
Reflections:
http://thewebfairy.com/911/pavel/reflection1.htm
http://thewebfairy.com/911/pavel/reflection2.htm
http://thewebfairy.com/911/pavel/reflection3.htm
Webfairy
911 Memorial
http://thewebfairy.com/911