Mysteries of Pavel Hlava 911-03 Video

Photo debunkers jump on Chrominence, cos it's a big word.

Lately I've suffered a lot of big-word tellytubby talk trying to convince people that video is meaningless. The latest news is because video decimates Chrominence, this is something dreadful that makes video unreliable, so you shouldn't believe your eyes but listen to them instead because they know a lot of big words.

Digital video decimates chrominence because it is the aspect of analog video that carries hue information. Once television's signal has travelled thru the Aether and been projected, the job of chrominence is done. If it hangs around on a digital image, red and blue chrominence just create noize. There is even a very expensive program to filter out chrominence for high resolution digital camera images suffering noize problems.
http://www.camerabits.com/QM2.html

The Chrominence of this video is particularly screwed, but this flaw was in the analog video, and perhaps the source itself. Possible reasons will be discussed later, and elsewhere.

This is an image from the Pavel Hlava 9-11-03 video, broken down to show Chrominence and Luminance, two aspects of video decimated by digital compression.

Luminance, the "black and white television" part of a video signal,provides analog television with information on brightness and contrast. Once the image has been digitized into any of the 16 million colors of a digital pixel, the luminance is no longer relevant, merely an artifact of an analog past.



From:
Vision and Art - The Biology of Seeing by Margaret Livingstone Chapter 12: Television, Movies, and Computer Graphics

http://mbb.harvard.edu/evolution_of_mind_and_brain/chapter_12.pdf

"Three tiny electron beams (one for each color) sweep across the screen incredibly fast to activate the pixels. That is, an entire picture is never present at any instant; rather, a television “image” represents a temporal smearing of these moving beams. Each beam starts in the upper left corner of the screen and moves from left to right. Then it jumps back and steps downward a tiny bit and sweeps from left to right again, and again, until it has swept across all 525 rows of elements that make up the screen-all in one-thirtieth of a second. It’s sort of like taking a Fourth of July sparkler and moving it incredibly rapidly back and forth and up and down to get a square image. The three beams scan simultaneously, illuminating the rows in an alternating regular pattern called interlacing."

If a television image has been digitized at other than it's native size (the information in an American analog television video digitizes as a 352x240 pixel image) then interlacing becomes a problem. In areas of high movement, the second pass falls behind.

This image shows the effect of interlacing in a rapidly panning scene in a double-sized capture.



Making the scene visually coherent requires de-interlacing it.

 

Interlace Artifact in Original Source

Aspect Ratio

De-Interlacing

Chrominence (this page)

Reflection

Second Hit Aspect Ratio Question