DISINFORMATION ABOUT SEPT 11

This section relates not to the disinformation perpetrated in support of the official story. That is addressed in the research section. Instead this section deals with the disinformation spread by the so called “truth movement”. Most of what calls itself the “9/11 truth movement” is no more concerned with truth with CNN or the Republicrats.

Over time I plan to write more essays and analysis on this subject but for the moment, the articles below speak for themselves.

The 9/11 Liar's Club - Morgan Reynolds, Judy Wood and Jim Fetzer - "Lying for Truth" May 18 2007

The Lies of Jim Fetzer - Fetzer tells the same lie as Cheney. May 4 2007

The Problem with Alex Jones Part 2: Doublethink on Flight 93 Dec 8 2006

The Truth About Truthlings. Doublethink in Action. Nov 7 2006.

The Problem with Alex Jones Sept 27 2006.

Professor Steven Jones trashes the demolition evidence Aug 26 2006.

Disinformation and the art of Critical thinking Jan 1 2006

The Dark side of Professor Jones Dec 17 2005

The (Phantom) Planes Meme adapted from 911review.com Dec 24 2005

How Mark Rabinowitz and Jim Hoffman Lied about the BTS Data Jan 1 2006

Become an instant 9/11 truth hero. Make up your own evidence ! Jan 6 2006

Now you too can churn out mountains of complete garbage on Sept 11 for the gullible and inexperienced. How to manufacture your own endless supply of evidence in a few easy steps, taking as little as 20 minutes per article. Jan 2 2006.

Jim Hoffman Trashes the Sept 11 Stand Down evidence Jan 6 2006

Scholars For 9/11 Plagiarism and Dinsinformation Feb 6 2006

WRITING FROM DEBATE FORUMS

Over the last few years, I have spent considerable time debating this kind of disinformation on public forums. My intention is to eventually adapt some of these into more carefully crafted articles, but in the interim , links to some of my writings in these forums are below.

I also include some links to other writers where I feel that important points are made.

Please bear in mind that these comments are hastily written in the context of ongoing debate, and are thus not as thorough in their documentation, prone to typos, and generally not as well written as if they had been worked on. They may also contain allusions to specific issues raised in the context of that debate, which do not make sense without reading the entire debate. Nevertheless some valuable information and insights are included.

Hoffman the Plagiarist Jul 2 2005

Hoffman the Spook Jul 2 2005

Hoffman and the Pentagon by “Jack Straw” July 3 2005

How Hoffman Distorts Evidence Jul 3 2005

Karl Scwarz Caught With His Pants Down June 3 2005

Why Schwarz lied About the A3 Sky Warrior June 6 2005

Why Scwarz Lied About the 737 June 6 2005

Karl Schwarz - Arms Dealer or Liar ? June 6 2005

Schwarz - Intel Contracter by Nico Haupt June 6 2005

Who Else is Schwarz Selling Weapons to ? June 12 2006

Karl Schwarz - Spook or Strutter ? May 2 2005 By Nico Haupt