|
MEDIA PUBLISHED FAKE PASSENGER LISTS FOR AMERICAL AIRLINES FLIGHT 11. Page 3 of 4. Go to page 1 2 4 Here are just a few of the sources which agree on the summation of 92 aboard.Most of them are sites with reasonably good reputations as reliable sources of information. None of them represent sources which question the official story in any way. So, if we have universal agreement that there were 92 aboard - 5 hijackers and 87 innocents - why can no-one agree on who those 87 innocents were? Which 6 of the 93 names are fictitious ? It appears that some spin doctor became partially aware of this awful clanger in the official story , and tried to solve the problem by putting up another of these hearsay sites - again failing to provide identification or sources. According to this list, there were 90 innocents aboard, and 5 hijackers, for a summation of 95. Not a word is said about the universally accepted figure of 92. This is simply swept aside as if the figure had never existed. 95 is the undisputed fact, so commonly accepted that its not worth sourcing or commenting upon. And just to prove it, they publish 90 names - 90 of the 93 collectively published in all of the other conflicting lists. But where did this list come from ? The site has not copied from any of the afore mentioned mainstream media sites. Or if its copied (without providing documentation), from some other mainstream source which has eluded my searches , then we have yet another contradictory list. But since this site broke basic documentation protocol, by providing no sources, we are entitled to assume the worst. That they fabricated their own list, by cobbling together 90 names from other collective lists - indicating that they were well aware of the discrepancies, but failed to note of three of the names - and then fabricated the summation of 95 aboard to try to make the figures add up - hoping that no-one would notice . The missing names are Jalbert, Tu and Vamsikrishna “ObituryRegistry.com which describes itself as “ a service of AmericanMemorials.com” has its own list of alleged AA11 victims. Its not immediately apparent what the official status, if any, of this site is.Since anyone can post anything they like on the internet, one needs to check these things carefully. So I followed some of the links to find out more about the site and its authors, and its official status, if any. I clicked the link for AmericanMemorials.com which took me here . It describes itself as the “The internet’s most complete database of current obituaries and death notices. Searchable by name,city and state, keywords and more.” It invites one to create one’s own memorial for for $US49.95. Following various links around the site gives no indication that it is anything other than a commercial operation, with no official status. So it appears as if anybody could create a memorial to anyone- real or fictitious - as long as they came up with the $49.95. So lets have a look at the list for AA11. It lists 90 innocents, and introduces two new names. Bill Weems and Timothy Ward. So we now have 95 alleged innocents. Those missing from this list are Tu, Booms, Vamsikrishna, Jalbert and Roux. There are now a minimum of 8 fictitious innocents -unless someone wants to suggest that there were 100 people aboard in total -or else get creative with the practical application of abstract maths and suggest that the plane was hijacked by a group of Arabs numbering minus three - in which case the media owes an explanation for why it keeps publishing 5 names for these minus three individuals. Someone is fibbing. Here is a summary of the anomalies between the lists. Collectively, these sources list the names of 95 alleged innocents. CNN lists 87 names, which should be a complete list ,but strongly implies that the list is incomplete. The 8 left out are Vamsikrishna, Roux, Iskander,Jalbert, Tu,Weems,Ward and Booms. USAT lists 86 names, citing this as a “partial list”, Those missing are Caplin, Jalbert, Jude Larson, Natalie Larson, Roux, Tu,Weems,Ward and Iskander. NBC lists 87 names. Its the same as USAT with the addition of Iskander, but changes Peter Hashem to Peter el-Hachem. PBS is identical to NBC. The Boston daily lists 89 innocents and describes it as a a partial list. Those missing are Iskander,Vamsikrishna,Tu , Weems,Ward and Booms. It is the only list to name Jalbert. A year later it lists 87 names, changing Heath Smith to Heather Smith, Hashem to el-Hachem , and losing Caplin, the two Larsons, Jalbert and Roux for Iskander, Vamsikrishna.and Booms. The “we will never forget” website lists 88 names. Those missing are Vamsrikrishna,Jalbert, Booms, Tu,Weems,Ward and Roux. The AA11 memorial website lists 90 names and claims 95 aboard. The missing names are Vamsikrishna,Tu, Weems,Ward and Jalbert. Wikipedia claims a summation of 93 aboard, but lists only 92 names (including hijackers).It is the only site to list Lana Tu. Those missing are Iskander, Vamsikrishna, Caplin, the two Larsons, Jalbert,Weems,Ward and Roux. This makes it the same as the USAT list with the addition of Tu or put another way - the Same as the NBC and PBS lists except that Tu is in for Isaknder. The American Memorials site lists 90 names and is the only list to name Weems and Ward. It leaves out Tu, Jalbert,Iskander,Vamsikrishna, Roux and Booms. Several sources claim that AA released 77 (or 75) names on Sept 12, but the Washington Post published 89 names the same day, and the Boston Daily published 89 - but not the same 89 - the day after, while Fox News was still claiming that only 81 names were available a week later. We still cant rule out the possibility that Caplin/Kaplan is a genuine co-incidence, but suspicion is justified, especially as Caplin is one of the frequently missing names. Some lists have Peter el-Hachem, others Peter Hashem Some lists have Heather Smith and others Heath Smith. Most lists have Antonio Montoya but one has Antonio Montoya Valdes. Since the media which sells us the official story universally agrees that there were 92 aboard - 87 innocents and 5 hijackers, then 8 of these names (although we cant yet specify which 8) must be fictitious. If 8 are confirmed as fictitious, then we are perfectly entitled to speculate with some validity that any number of the 95 could be fictitious. As if that’s not enough, four of the 95 are also listed as having been on UA 175 that day. Roux, Jalbert, Weems and Ward. For example, CNN’s flight 175 list. Although on this list, also from CNN, it’s Roberta instead of Robert. And this list (found after I completed the analysis above) from the Globe and mail, dated sept 13 , 2001 has Robert Jalbert on Flight 11 and Roberta Jalbert on Flight 175. So does this list. What a mess ! This crime - the murder of approximately 3000 people , and the excuse for two wars - and presumably more to come - is supposed to have been properly investigated and documented ? Why should we be expected to believe who the hijackers were, when the spin doctors can’t even do a credible fabrication job of a list of innocent victims ? It’s previously been demanded by many sceptics that we need to see a verifiable official passenger list which actually contains the names of the alleged hijackers. We can now take the implications of that further and point to the absence of any passenger list documentation which stands up to scrutiny as a credible document. We have nothing which could support the existence of any of the alleged passengers on the alleged flight. The fact is - that in nearly three years - the media has tried to give the impression that they have published valid passenger lists, when all that has been provided is the contradictory rubbish exposed in this investigation. We are left with no choice but to conclude that these AA11 lists are fabrications. Personal stories of those allegedly involved have been built on the basis of these fabricated lists. As qualified earlier, some of them may be real people, who are really missing, but the passenger lists are lies. I say “alleged flight” because here is official documentation that there was no such flight as AA11 on Sept 11, 2001. The article linked below presents documentation that if one is to use media reports as the basis to claim the existence of such a flight, then one would have to believe that there were two AA11s on that day. Flight 11 - The Twin Flight - by Woody Box Video and forensic evidence that the object which struck the Nth Tower of the WTC was not a plane. |
|
GERARD HOLMGREN’S SEPT 11 WRITING AND RESEARCH |