| In
1957 Ray A. Neff of Gibbsboro, New Jersey, walked into Leary's bookshop in
Philadelphia and purchased a faded, second-hand book for fifty cents.
Unbeknownst to Neff, inside that dusty military journal was a profound and
stunning confession from the grave of a Union General and traitor,
Lafayette Baker.
Booth was not alone, and according to Gen Baker,
did indeed survive.
And as late as 1977, the FBI, did in fact
investigate the issue of JOHN
WILKES BOOTH and his possible survival. (Recently the Bureau released 184
pages in PDF format.) According to the FBI,
"These records contain correspondence dated
1922-23 of William J. Burns, former Director of the Bureau of
Investigation, concerning a theory that Booth lived many years after the
assassination of President Lincoln. Also included are the results of a
1948 examination by the FBI Laboratory of a boot said to be worn by Booth
on the night of the assassination and a 1977 examination of a diary
belonging to Booth."
On January 23, 1923, William J. Burns, by then
the acting director of the Department of Justice wrote "I have gone
over with considerable interest the volume entitled "The Escape and
Suicide of John Wilkes Booth" by Finis L. Bates of Memphis,
Tennessee...The work contains very strong evidence in support of the old
belief that Booth did escape and live many years after the assassination
of President Lincoln..." (see page 12, booth1.pdf )
Left:
The Lincoln Conspirators. But apparently, none of the masterminds. Click
here for an update.
In fear for his life, Gen. Baker wrote the
aforementioned confession before he was fatally poisoned with arsenic in
1868. If someone today could forge this confession, he would have to learn
two different ciphers, and then invent a time machine, because he would
have to perform the deed no later than October 1872. The book itself is
referred to in a Philadelphia probate hearing held October 14 and 15,
1872; when William Carter testified that Lafayette Baker gave him an
English military journal in the days before he died, which Carter tried to
decipher but couldn't, even though he was familiar with codes from his
days in the National Detective Police during the Civil War.
Carter also testified that he saw Baker writing
his coded memoirs in the margins of numerous books; the same which were
the subject of the hearing, and that Baker tried to give him about a dozen
boxes of books and papers. When John Wilkes Booth
shot Lincoln, he was already famous for playing in Shakespeare's
"Julius Caesar", and the allusion to Booth is obvious-- he's
"one of the sons of Brutus". Johnson, who was in possession of
a letter from Booth before the assassination, is also one of the the
"sons". Judas was Edwin Stanton-- Lincoln's Secretary of
War, whom at the moment Lincoln died, actually did say "Now the
ages have him and the nation now have I."
The Black Hand-- the Original
Mafia
It was Serb freemasons in the Black Hand, the
precursor of the Mafia, who launched World War I in 1914 when they
convinced Gavrillo Princip to assassinate the Austrian Archduke Franz
Ferdinand and his wife Sophie in the streets of Sarajevo. Archduke
Ferdinand's crime? From the mason's perspective, he was a Roman Catholic
and heir to the Austrian throne.
During the trial of Archduke Ferdinand's
killer, Gavrillo Princep testified that his colleague, Ciganovich,
"told me he was a freemason" and "on another occaison
told me that the Heir Apprent had been condemned to death by a
freemason's lodge." Moreover, another of the accused
assassins, Chabrinovitch, testified that Major Tankositch, one of the
plotters, was a freemason.
*
The Black Hand was the original Mafia, or La
Cosa Nostra. And the Italian Luciferian freemason who created their
blood rituals and secret oath, the omerta, was the Carbonari/Illuminati
freemason Giuseppe Mazzini; the recipient of Pike's August 15, 1871
letter in which outlined three world wars to prepare the way for a New
World Order.
Both diaries, Bakers and Booth's, gave parallel
accounts of the assassination. Both implicated, even boasted of a secret
government council (the Scottish Rite) which in the interests of the
British Crown has bound a nation, the United States of America, for over
a century. (Gen. Baker's coded diaries, incidentally, were written in
the margins of a British military journal; Colburn's United Service
Magazine/Naval and Military Journal.) The coded book, its messages
written in a sliding cipher, revealed that the true killers were led by
Lincoln's most trusted military advisor in the Civil War: Edwin
McMasters Stanton.
About seven years later, the modus operandi
described in that book was revisited in the Kennedy assassination. The
infamous Lincoln and Kennedy parallels, for instance, are uncanny until
you realize it was a ritual, copycat murder-- literally, and performed
by the same secret society of traitors. The Lincoln and Kennedy murders
were both bipartisan masonic coups; and the masterminds in both
assassinations belonged to the same Scottish Rite; which in turn, is
controlled by Great Britain, the English Crown.
This aforementioned international secret
society, the largest, has its headquarters temple in Washington DC, and
curiously, it presently houses the crypt of Confederate Gen. Albert
Pike, a Tennessee Ku Klux Klan Chief Judicial Officer, Imperial Wizard
and 33rd Degree Scottish Rite Sovereign Grand Commander.
Much like we would see in 1963 in the Kennedy
assassination; in 1865 at least two newspapers would publish highly
detailed stories of the Lincoln assassination several hours before
it ever took place. Moreover, in 1868 Lafayette Baker would confess in
his coded diary that at least three newspaper publishers were involved,
through blood money and disinformation, in the plot to kill Lincoln.
Thus we move from the publishers' lucky premonition to outright
foreknowledge and complicity. This, too, was a betrayal of the public's
trust which the mass media repeated in 1963, but continues to maintain--
particularly through the New York Times (JFK) and the Los Angeles Times
(RFK).
As
Anton
Chaitkin wrote in the New Republic:
"A striking instance of the Confederate
'Lost Cause,' persisting and haunting the present century, is to be seen
in the attic of The New York Times. Iphigenie Ochs
married Arthur Hays Sulzberger in 1917. He succeeded her father Adolphe
Ochs as publisher of The Times, which Mr. Ochs had bought in the
1890s. Adolphe Ochs and his father founded the "Baroness
Erlanger" Hospital in Chattanooga, Tennessee. The hospital was
named for
John Slidell’s
daughter who married the Confederacy’s chief financier Baron Emil
Erlanger...Adolphe Ochs had married Iphigenie Wise, the daughter of B’nai
B’rith’s Cincinnati leader Isaac Wise..."
In Kennedy's case, intelligence agents in
Russia read Soviet accounts of the Dallas ambush several hours before
the hit took ever took place. By December, 1966, the
KGB would
finally determine Kennedy's true murderer, and they concluded it was
Lyndon Johnson. With the murders of Robert F. Kennedy and Martin Luther
King Jr. in 1968; that conclusion was fully vindicated.
Today a pro-British paramilatary
group derivative of the freemasonic Black Hand,
the
Red Hand, was recently founded by Orangemen freemasons in
Northern Ireland. The Red Hand has an objective that remains one
and the same with the previous masonic order, the Black Hand-- it is to
divide Christianity by asserting Protestantism, and by extention Martin
Luther himself, advocated and practiced the same freemasonry he
detested. But is this really a battle between Catholicism and
Protestantism? No one but the freemason appeals to this argument,
no one does more to pit these two forces against one another to
weaken the Body of Christ. This is in keeping with those who had
crucified Christ, and would do it again....
In America, for instance, most
Protestants, Baptists and all Catholics oppose freemasonry as subversive
to Christianity. The exceptions are the Mormons and Jehova's
Witnesses, both created by freemasons, York Rite (Joseph Smith) and
Scottish Rite, (Thomas Russell). In the Scottish Rite, the
18th
degree initiate is asked to trample the cross underfoot as a form of
denial and contempt. (The KKK, created by the same Rite, exceeds
this blasphemy by burning the cross itself in homage to its Templar,
anti-Christian heritage.) Interestingly, the
Jehova's Witnesses share something in common with the Scottish Rite,
in keeping with their founder. In the teachings of the Jehova's
Witnesses, a similiar denial of the cross is taught early on. New
members are taught that Jesus died on a stake, not a cross, their
leaders obviously adverse to very symbolism of the Christian cross. And
both the Mormons and JWs either rewrote the Scriptures, or present
alternate versions of the same; such as the Book of Mormon, which Smith
proclaimed more correct than the Bible itself.
All of which is to say, whether you call
yourself a Protestant, a Catholic, a Jew, a Baptist; freemasonry is a
practice condemned by both the law of Moses and Christianity. Yet
the same people who claim it is justified and condoned by both, you'll
notice, are the same freemasons who burn crosses to terrify a fellow
American, the same who piously march into Catholic enclaves-- an open
Bible before them-- merely to instigate sectarion rioting. These
are the same hypocrites who built the concentration camps to honor
Christ with the blood of women and children.
The battle in Northern Ireland is not one
between the Protestant and Catholic. It is between the Catholic and the
freemason, the freemason who represents the British interests. And
these British interests, alas, include certain extremist, right-wing
factions in Israel. These are the same people that killed one
recent Jewish Prime Minister, a man of God who was the first to make a
serious attempt at peace with PLO; a brave and beloved
peacemaker that came before the present right-wing scourge, Benjamin
Netanyahu. |